ISSN Number - pISSN 2250 – 0685 | eISSN 2321-3817

Your Advertisement

Bilateral Fractures of Anatomic Medullary Locking Hip Arthroplasty Stems in a Single Patient: A Case Report

CROSSMARK LOGO

Bilateral Fractures of Anatomic Medullary Locking Hip Arthroplasty Stems in a Single Patient: A Case Report

[box type=”bio”] Learning Point of the Article: [/box]

Patients with a previously well-functioning fully porous-coated THA presenting with a new complaint of thigh pain should be thoroughly evaluated for possible stem fracture, which may be a subtle radiographic finding.


Case Report | Volume 10 | Issue 2 | JOCR March – April 2020 | Page 46-49 | Sean E Slaven, Colin J Harrington, John P Cody. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i02.1690


AuthorsSean E Slaven[1], Colin J Harrington[1], John P Cody[1]

[1]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Sean E Slaven,
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bldg 19, Floor 2, Room 2010, Bethesda, Maryland 20889, USA.
E-mail: sean.e.slaven@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction: Stem fracture is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using fully porous-coated femoral stems. Bilateral fractures in a single patient have not been previously reported.
Case Report: A 48-year-old female underwent bilateral staged primary THA with fully porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. She subsequently sustained stem fractures of her right and left prostheses in the 13th and 14th years after their implantation, respectively.
Conclusion: The bilateral nature of this rare complication in a single patient supports the notion that stem fracture results from a mismatch between the mechanical stresses encountered in vivo and the structural properties of small-diameter stems. Surgeons should be cognizant of this potential complication when evaluating patients at long-term follow-up with new-onset pain.
Keywords: Fully porous-coated prosthesis, stem fracture, total hip arthroplasty.


Introduction
Stem fracture is a very rare complication associated with the use of fully porous-coated femoral stems, with only 17 cases reported in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Most of the reported cases of stem fracture occurred after a fully porous-coated prosthesis was used in revision arthroplasty, and bilateral stem fracture in one patient has never been reported. We report a case of a single patient who underwent sequential total hip arthroplasty (THA) of both hips with an anatomic medullary locking (AML) femoral prosthesis and subsequently sustained femoral stem fractures bilaterally in the 13th and 14th post-operative years. The patient was informed that information about their case would be submitted for publication, and they provided consent.

Case Report
A healthy and active female underwent primary THA of the right hip for end-stage osteoarthritis in May 2003, at age 48. After an uncomplicated post-operative course and rehabilitation, she underwent primary THA of the left hip in December 2003, at age 49. She again had no post-operative complications and recovered well with reported improvement in pain and function of both hips. Both surgeries were performed by a single, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon at our institution using an AML femoral prosthesis with Pinnacle Acetabular component (DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) and a metal-on-metal articulation. The stem diameter of both prostheses was 12 mm.
After the immediate post-operative follow-up period, she next presented to the clinic in November 2008 for routine evaluation. Radiographs at that time demonstrated 3 mm of osteolysis in the bilateral proximal femurs, Gruen zones 1, 2, 6, and 7 (Fig. 1). She reported no pain or functional limitations.


In December 2015, she presented to the clinic with the chief complaint of the right thigh pain. She had sustained a low-energy ground-level fall 2 weeks prior to presentation and subsequently developed unremitting right thigh pain a week later, exacerbated by weight-bearing. Radiographs revealed a fracture through the femoral stem of her right THA prosthesis (Fig. 2). She underwent laboratory testing and hip aspiration to rule out infection and subsequently underwent revision right THA using a restoration modular prosthesis with a ceramic on polyethylene articulation (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) in December 2015, at 12.6 years postoperatively (Fig. 3). She rehabilitated well and reported pain relief and excellent function of her right hip.
In April 2017, she presented with the complaint of hip and thigh pain, this time on her left side. Initial radiographs of her hip prosthesis demonstrated no obvious abnormalities and were read as normal (Fig. 4). She returned to the clinic in May 2017 with continued thigh pain with weight-bearing, and new radiographs demonstrated a fracture through the femoral stem of her left THA prosthesis (Fig. 5). When further scrutinized in retrospect by the orthopedic surgery team, the previous radiographs from April demonstrated a subtle non-displaced fracture of the femoral stem. The patient underwent revision left THA using a restoration modular prosthesis with a ceramic on polyethylene articulation (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) in May 2017, at 13.4 years postoperatively (Fig. 6).


Both revision surgeries were performed using an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) at the level of the stem fracture, and trephines were used to enable removal of the distal aspect of the stem. The stem was able to be removed uneventfully in both cases using this technique. Fixation of the ETO was performed using cables (Fig. 6). At 1 year follow-up from her most recent surgery, she continues to report complete pain relief and excellent function in both hips (Fig. 7).

Discussion
We report on the first known case of bilateral femoral stem fracture in the same patient. The fracture of a fully coated stem is a rare complication with only 17 cases reported in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] (Table 1). Fully porous-coated cylindrical femoral stems have demonstrated satisfactory long-term results with an acceptable survival rate in both primary and revision THA [1, 7, 8, 9]. The peak time period for fully porous-coated stem usage in primary THA dictates that many patients are now in the >10 year follow-up period and are at potential risk for this complication. The similar timing of the failure of both stems supports the notion that this rare complication occurs as the result of a mismatch between the mechanical stresses encountered in vivo and the structural properties of small diameter fully porous-coated stems rather than as a result of individual implant defects or accidental trauma. A number of patient and implant-related risk factors have been thought to contribute to prosthetic fracture. In a 2005 study, Busch et al. demonstrated a body mass index (BMI)>30 kg/m2, poor proximal bone support, and diameter of femoral stem <13.5mm, and the use of an ETOwas associated with stem fractures [2]. Additionally, younger, more active patients with proximal osteolysis and distal bony in growth may be subjected to increased cycles of cantilever loading, increasing the risk of stem fracture [3]. Although the previous studies demonstrated an acceptable survival rate, concerns regarding proximal osteolysis and the prevalence of stress shielding in fully porous-coated stems have led to a decreased use of these implants in recent years [9, 10]. Furthermore, a revision of a fully porous-coated cylindrical femoral stem is a technically challenging procedure that often necessitates use of an ETO [2, 3, 11]. In retrospect, our patient was at increased risk for stem fracture due to her BMI >30 kg/m2, proximal osteolysis, bilateral stem diameters of 12mm,relatively young age, and high activity level following primary THA. Unlike most other reports in the literature, our patient sustained her stem fracture following primary THA as opposed to a revision procedure [1, 2, 3,5]. Chun et al. recently reported a fracture of a fully coated femoral stem (VerSysBeaded Fullcoat; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) after primary THA for nonunion of an intertrochanteric fracture in a patient with risk factors of BMI >30 and poor posteromedial bone support. The femoral stem used in that case was 14mm and 2mm larger diameter than the stems used in our patient. Although our patient did sustain a low-energy ground-level fall 2 weeks before presenting with the right femoral stem fracture, a majority of patients with prosthetic fractures presented due to insidious hip pain without a history of trauma, similar to presentation for her left stem fracture [3, 5]. With this information in mind, it is vital for practicing orthopedic surgeons to recognize potential risk factors for prosthetic stem fractures in both primary and revision arthroplasty with fully porous-coated prostheses. Specifically, overweight patients with stems <13.5 mm in diameter should be considered high risk, especially in patients presenting with new thigh pain in follow-up. We recommend increased clinical and radiographic vigilance in evaluating these patients as they present in follow-up.

Conclusion
Stem fracture is a known but rare complication following implantation of a fully porous-coated femoral stem. We report a case of bilateral stem fracture in the same patient at similar times after index surgery, which highlights the strong impact of her risk factors for stem fracture. The fracture can initially be a subtle radiographic finding and result in delayed diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical Message
Patients with a previously well-functioning fully porous-coated THA presenting with a new complaint of thigh pain should be thoroughly evaluated for possible stem fracture, which may be a subtle radiographic finding.

References
1. SotereanosNG, EnghCA, GlassmanAH, MacalinoGE, EnghCA Jr. Cementless femoral components should be made from cobalt chrome.Clin OrthopRelat Res1995;313:146-53.
2. BuschCA, CharlesMN, HaydonCM, BourneRB, RorabeckCH, MacdonaldSJ, et al. Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br2005;87:1333-6.
3. LandaJ, BenkeM, DayanA, PereiraG, DiCesare PE. Fracture of fully coated echelon femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2009;24:322.e13-8.
4. LuHC, LinCL, ChangCW, LaiKA. Fracture of VerSys fully bead-coated long femoral stems: Report on four fractures in 41 hips.Kaohsiung J Med Sci2012;28:345-9.
5. GallartX, ClaretG, GarciaS, Fernández-ValenciaJA, RibaJ. Rupture of extensively porous coated stems-a case series of 2 patients.J Orthop Case Rep2014;4:36-9.
6. ChunYS, JuhHS, ChoYJ, RhyuKH. Fracture of fully-coated femoral stem after primary total hip arthroplasty for nonunion of intertrochanteric fracture: A case report.Hip Pelvis2015;27:179-82.
7. MorelandJR, BernsteinML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems.Clin OrthopRelat Res1995;319:141-50.
8. PaproskyWG, GreidanusNV, AntoniouJ. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.Clin OrthopRelat Res1999;369:230-42.
9. BelmontPJ Jr., PowersCC, BeykirchSE, HopperRH Jr., EnghCA Jr., EnghCA. Results of the anatomic medullary locking total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of twenty years. A concise follow-up of previous reports.J Bone Joint Surg Am2008;90:1524-30.
10. Dattani R. Femoral osteolysis following total hip replacement. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:312-6.
11. SambandamSN, DuraisamyG, ChandrasekharanJ, MounasamyV. Extended trochanteric osteotomy: Current concepts review.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2016;26:231-45.


Dr. Sean E Slaven  Dr. Colin J Harrington Dr. John P Cody

How to Cite This Article: Slaven SE, Harrington CJ, Cody JP. Bilateral Fractures of Anatomic Medullary Locking Hip Arthroplasty Stems in a Single Patient: A Case Report. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2020 Mar-Apr;10(2): 46-49.

[Full Text HTML] [Full Text PDF] [XML]


[rate_this_page]


Dear Reader, We are very excited about New Features in JOCR. Please do let us know what you think  by Clicking on the Sliding “Feedback Form” button on the  <<< left of the page or sending a mail to us at editor.jocr@gmail.com 


 

RELATED POSTS