<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="case-report" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Orthop Case Reports</journal-id>
<journal-title>Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2250-0685</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2321-3817</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JOCR-11-78</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i07.2326</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Case Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Arthroscopy Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation of a Lateral Femoral Condyle Fracture after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Graft Salvage and Reinforced Suspensory Femoral fixation &#x2013; A Case Report</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tambe</surname>
<given-names>Deepak Anil</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Pushpak</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gnany</surname>
<given-names>Jabez</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Venugopal</surname>
<given-names>Vinayak</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kandarkar</surname>
<given-names>Sanket</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sayed</surname>
<given-names>Saif Rammathulla</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Orthopaedics, Rural Medical College, Pravara Medical Trust, Loni, Maharashtra, India</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>Address of Correspondence:</bold> Dr. Pushpak Kumar, Department of Orthopaedics, Rural Medical College, Pravara Medical Trust, Loni, Maharashtra, India. <bold>E-mail:</bold> <email xlink:href="dr.pushpak.kumar@gmail.com">dr.pushpak.kumar@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>7</issue>
<fpage>78</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>04</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><month>06</month><year>2021</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Introduction:</title>
<p>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft is a commonly performed orthopedic surgery. Lateral femoral condyle fracture through the femoral tunnel is a rare complication following ACL reconstruction. These cases are reported to be managed in two stages, fracture fixation by open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafting of the femoral tunnel, followed by revision ACL reconstruction after the fracture union.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Case Report:</title>
<p>A 41-year-old male Kabaddi player underwent right knee arthroscopic ACL reconstruction following an ACL tear in January 2021, sustained a road traffic accident 7 weeks later and developed a lateral femoral condyle fracture. The graft was intact and trapped into the fracture site making fracture reduction difficult. The graft was lax due to the fixed loop button being trapped in the fracture. The patient was treated in a single stage by arthroscopy assisted fracture reduction and fixation with ACL graft salvage and reinforced suspensory femoral graft fixation to plate suspensory fixation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Conclusion:</title>
<p>This case is a rare presentation of lateral condyle fracture after ACL reconstruction and both the issues are managed in a single stage with the help of detailed surgical planning, using utmost arthroscopy skills and keeping all the options of fixation devices ready on the table during the surgery.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Anterior cruciate ligament</kwd>
<kwd>anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</kwd>
<kwd>lateral femoral condyle fracture</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<boxed-text>
<title>Learning Point of the Article:</title>
<p>Single stage surgery for the lateral femoral condyle fracture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to manage both fracture and graft should be kept in mind.</p>
</boxed-text>
<sec id="sec1-1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopedic surgery. Quadrupled hamstring tendon (HT) is the most widely used autograft option [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>]. The common complications of this surgery are anterior knee pain, stiffness, secondary meniscal lesions, ACL re-rupture, infections, and thromboembolic complications, and peri-articular fracture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. Peri-articular fractures are an uncommon but devastating complication following ACL reconstruction. Fractures of the patella [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>], tibial plateau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>], tibial tubercle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>], supra-condylar femur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>], medial femoral condyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>], and and lateral femoral condyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>] have been reported after primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Lateral femoral condyle fracture through the femoral tunnel is a rare but reported complication following both primary and revision ACL reconstruction at varied postoperative intervals. The femoral tunnel can act as a stress riser facilitating the fracture more so in revision ACL reconstructions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>] and after months to years of primary ACL reconstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]. These cases have been reported to be managed in two stages, fracture fixation by open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafting of the femoral tunnel, followed by revision ACL reconstruction after the fracture union [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>].</p>
<p>We report a unique case of lateral femoral condyle fracture involving the femur tunnel, 7 weeks after primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction which was managed in single-stage by arthroscopy assisted reduction and internal fixation of fracture and ACL graft salvage with reinforcement of cortical suspensory femoral fixation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-2" sec-type="cases">
<title>Case Report</title>
<p>A 41-year-old male, Kabaddi player, presented to Pravara Rural Hospital, Loni in January 2021 with right knee instability of 6 months duration, positive Lachman test, complete ACL tear and medial meniscus posterior horn Grade III tear on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). He was treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis (HT) graft fixed with 15 mm closed-loop button on the femur and 25 mm &#x00D7; 8 mm titanium screw on the tibia and medial meniscus balancing. Post-operative radiographs confirmed well-fixed button and good tunnel positions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). The patient was started on knee rehabilitation, closed chain exercises, and full weight-bearing.</p>
<fig id="F1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Postanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction radiograph (a) anteroposterior and (b) lateral view. Arrow showing well-fixed button onto cortex.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Two months after the surgery, the patient met with a road traffic accident and fell from a moving motorcycle with twisting injury to the same knee. The patient presented to us 7 days later with severe pain, even on slight movement, moderate effusion in the right knee with an inability to bear weight. Lachman and varus and values stress test were positive. An anteroposterior radiograph revealed a double joint line sign of lateral femoral condyle with the button sunk inside the lateral femoral cortex. Oblique radiograph confirmed a fracture passing through the femur tunnel with the button inside the fracture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>). MRI showed a spiral displaced fracture of the lateral femoral condyle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>), intact but lax graft fibers, and a button artifact inside the fracture line with intact medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Pre-operative radiographs (a) anteroposterior view. Arrow showing double joint line sign at the lateral condyle of the femur. (b) Oblique view shows button inside the fracture site.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (a) coronal view showing spiral fracture, (b) para-sagittal view showing coronal fracture line starting from the joint, (c) axial view showing oblique fracture plane.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (a) coronal view showing intact graft fibers within the femur tunnel and button artifact inside the tunnel (b) sagittal view. Arrows indicate intact graft fibers, not parallel to Blumensaat&#x2019;s line indicating laxity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Arthroscopy assisted fracture reduction and internal fixation with an assessment of graft and possible salvage were planned. Arthroscopy revealed an intra-articular spiral fracture of the lateral femoral condyle involving the femur tunnel with intact graft fibers trapped into the fracture site making the fracture reduction difficult. The fracture plane was coronal distally inside the joint (as seen in arthroscopy) then attended para-sagittal orientation as it exited at the lateral cortex (seen after exposure of lateral condyle later). Trapped fibers of graft hindering the reduction of the fracture were pulled by a suture loop passed around the graft introduced through the anteromedial portal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Arthroscopy image (a) intact graft but partly in the tunnel and partly into the fracture site and (b) suture loop passed around graft through anteromedial portal.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A lateral longitudinal incision was made over the lateral distal femur centered on the supracondylar ridge. Careful dissection was done to expose the lateral end of the fractured femoral tunnel. The fixed loop button attached to the graft was pulled out laterally from the fracture site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Fig. 6</xref>). The fixed loop was seen through the fracture site and was intact with graft looping into it. Two sutures were passed through the two outer holes of the button (end sutures). These two end sutures above and Tigerwire (Arthrex, Inc, Naples, Florida) looping the graft below through the anteromedial portal were pulled simultaneously by two assistants. This was done to (a) keep the button over the cortex and (b) keep the graft in tension, to keep it reduced into the femur tunnel, out of fracture site (as seen by the arthroscope).</p>
<fig id="F6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Intra-operative clinical photograph (a) showing coronal nature of fracture at the exiting the cortex. (b) Button retrieved from the fracture site with the help of one end of the suture.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Then internal fixation with an anteroposterior cannulated cancellous screw was done. Fracture reduction was confirmed by arthroscopy as well as fluoroscopy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Fig. 7</xref>). In addition, a 4 hole 3.5 low contact dynamic compression plate (DCP) was contoured and placed on the posterolateral ridge of lateral femoral condyle over the button, with the two end suture of the button, kept one on each side of the plate. The plate was perpendicular to the fracture line buttress the fracture and fixed with screws. Screws are passed in a way avoiding the femur tunnel.</p>
<fig id="F7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Intra-operative clinical photograph (a) showing coronal nature of fracture at the exiting the cortex. Arthroscopy image (a) showing intra-articular anatomical reduction, (b) reduction in lateral gutter, (c) fluoroscopy image showing restored joint line and button sandwiched between plate and cortex.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>After fracture fixation, the ACL graft was found to be intact and stable on probing. The button end sutures were pulled, tensioned to make the button horizontal, and sandwiched between the plate and the lateral femoral cortex. The button end sutures were then tied over the plate, creating an additional reinforced suspensory femoral fixation of the graft with the plate.</p>
<p>Post-operative radiographs revealed anatomic reduction and fixation of the fracture with a properly placed interference screw and button on plate suspension (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Fig. 8</xref>). Postoperatively, the patient was started on knee range of motion (heel slides), static quadriceps, and straight leg raising exercises (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Fig. 9</xref>). The patient was kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks.</p>
<fig id="F8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Post-operative radiographs (a) anteroposterior and (b) lateral views showing anatomical reduction and button seated horizontally between the plate and lateral cortex.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F9">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinical photograph of the patient showing range of motion at 6weeks follow-up with up to 90 degrees of flexion.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-3" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Lateral femoral condylar fracture after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a rare occurrence. A review of the literature indicates that most cases occur due to trauma along with possible stress riser at the femoral tunnel; that too after either revision ACL reconstruction or a long time after primary ACL reconstruction due to tunnel widening.</p>
<p>This is a unique case where the patient had a high energy trauma (twisting) to the right knee 7 weeks after primary ACL reconstruction leading to a lateral condyle fracture through the femoral tunnel stress riser. The femoral stress riser is increased by sub-optimal tunnel positions, larger tunnel size, and different graft fixation methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>]. Our patient had an optimally oriented femoral tunnel which was 8 mm in diameter and placed with an intact 2 mm of the posterior femoral cortex. Tunnel wall integrity was checked using the tunnel view test.</p>
<p>Our patient presented with a lateral femoral condyle fracture 7 weeks after a primary ACL reconstruction. This is an uncommon presentation as most reported cases were after revision ACL reconstruction or with delayed presentation of primary ACL reconstruction due to tunnel widening. All these cases reported were managed with open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture with or without revision ACL reconstruction. This was a unique case with (a) spiral fracture of lateral femoral condyle passing through femoral tunnel, (b) non-integration of graft in the tunnel (7 weeks post-ACL reconstruction), (c) lax but intact graft fibers, (d) graft fibers trapped in the fracture site making fracture reduction difficult, and (e) intact fixed loop button but trapped into the fracture (compromised femoral fixation).</p>
<p>The surgical plan was (a) anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation of the fracture (arthroscopy assisted or open), (b) preservation of the graft fibers by reducing them from fracture site back to femoral tunnel, arthroscopically, (c) re-tensioning and reinforcement of the femoral fixation of the graft, and (d) preferably in a single stage if possible.</p>
<p>We managed to do everything in a single stage surgery. Closed loop button fixation of primary ACL reconstruction was reinforced with the loop button tied over the DCP in tension creating an additional plate suspensory fixation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-4" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This case is a rare presentation of lateral condyle fracture after ACL reconstruction and both the issues are managed in single stage with the help of detailed surgical planning, using utmost arthroscopy skills and keeping all the options of fixation devices ready on table during the surgery.</p>
<boxed-text>
<title>Clinical Message</title>
<p>Single stage surgery for the lateral femoral condyle fracture after ACL reconstruction to manage both fracture and graft is always to be kept in mind. For this detailed surgical planning and good arthroscopy skills are required; options of fixation devices should be ready on table during the surgery.</p>
</boxed-text>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<bio>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g010.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g011.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g012.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g013.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g014.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-11-78-g015.tif"/></p>
</bio>
<ref-list>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cerulli</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Placella</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sebastiani</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tei</surname>
<given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Speziali</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manfreda</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>ACL reconstruction:Choosing the graft</article-title>
<source>Joints</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<fpage>18</fpage>
<lpage>24</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rousseau</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Labruyere</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kajetanek</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deschamps</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makridis</surname>
<given-names>KG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Djian</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their relation to the type of graft:A prospective study of 958 cases</article-title>
<source>Am J Sports Med</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<fpage>2543</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunt</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosen</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sherman</surname>
<given-names>OH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Arthroscopy</source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>578</fpage>
<lpage>83</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moen</surname>
<given-names>KY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boynton</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raasch</surname>
<given-names>WG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fracture of the proximal tibia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A case report</article-title>
<source>Am J Orthop</source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<fpage>629</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Acton</surname>
<given-names>KJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dowd</surname>
<given-names>GS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fracture of the tibial tubercle following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Knee</source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<fpage>157</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mithoefer</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname>
<given-names>TJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vrahas</surname>
<given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Supracondylar femoral fracture after arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A case report</article-title>
<source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<fpage>1591</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Noah</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sherman</surname>
<given-names>OH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fractures of the supracondylar femur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon and iliotibial band tenodesis. A case report</article-title>
<source>Am J Sports Med</source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<fpage>615</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<label>8</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montgomery</surname>
<given-names>CO</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname>
<given-names>RP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of a medial femoral condylar fracture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A case report</article-title>
<source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>90</volume>
<fpage>863</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<label>9</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ternes</surname>
<given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blasier</surname>
<given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alexander</surname>
<given-names>AH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fracture of the femur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a GORE-TEX prosthetic graft. A case report</article-title>
<source>Am J Sports Med</source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<fpage>147</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<label>10</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname>
<given-names>EE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lateral femoral condyle fracture after endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Arthroscopy</source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<fpage>693</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<label>11</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Coobs</surname>
<given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spiridonov</surname>
<given-names>SI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>LaPrade</surname>
<given-names>RF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Intra-articular lateral femoral condyle fracture following an ACL revision reconstruction</article-title>
<source>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>1290</fpage>
<lpage>3</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<label>12</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keyhani</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaziri</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shafiei</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mardani-Kivi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Femoral condyle fracture during revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:Case report and a review of literature</article-title>
<source>Arch Bone Jt Surg</source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<fpage>137</fpage>
<lpage>40</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<label>13</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Julien</surname>
<given-names>TP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramappa</surname>
<given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez</surname>
<given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Femoral condylar fracture through a femoral tunnel eleven years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A case report</article-title>
<source>J Bone Joint Surg Am</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>92</volume>
<fpage>963</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<label>14</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>TC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kantaras</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atay</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery</article-title>
<source>Am J Sports Med</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<fpage>543</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p><bold>Conflict of Interest:</bold> Nil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="supported-by">
<p><bold>Source of Support:</bold> Nil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p><bold>Consent:</bold> The authors confirm that informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p><bold>Declaration of patient consent:</bold> The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient&#x0027;s parents have given their consent for patient images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient&#x0027;s parents understand that his names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
