Injuries of the sub-axial cervical spine (C3-7) are among the most common and potentially most devastating injuries involving the axial skeleton. The cervical spine often is injured in motor vehicle accidents and falls, resulting in bony or soft-tissue injury; however, the presence of multiple traumatic injuries may distract the examiner from the cervical spine. In the evaluation of the polytrauma patient, examination of the cervical spine is of utmost priority and must take precedence, along with maintenance of airway. The treatment of fracture dislocations of the cervical spine still varies. Several reports on various treatment protocols have been published, but surprisingly few [1, 2] have compared their benefits and drawbacks. The treatment protocol for acute cord injury has no clear consensus regarding timing of decompression, but few studies including animal studies do support early decompression for better outcome in patients with bifacetal dislocation and incomplete cord injury with detoriating nural function.[2, 3, 4]. (I do n’’ot agree with the statement that there is controversy in management of acute traumatic fracture dislocation of spine in terms of operative management. The references quoted are for unilateral facetal dislocation and not for fracture dislocation. In recent years, the early operative treatment has gained increasing acceptance [5]. We report a case of sub-axial cervical spine fracture dislocation and spondyloptosis with minimal neurological compromise and after reduction and stabilization, complete recovery of neurological function. (please correct the spellings).

A 26-year - old ambulatory male patient presented to the emergency department with alleged history of road traffic accident with injury to his neck. He complained of severe neck and right shoulder pain along with weakness in the right upper limb. He had 2 two episodes of vomiting after injury. The patient had a history of difficulty in micturition and had to put pressure for voiding,; however, complete urinary retention was n’’ot there. The patient was catheterized with 14 Fr Foley’’s Catheter to relieve of his symptoms. In addition, the patient did not pass stool since the injury. (what do you mean by altered Bowel bladder habit). On primary survey, he was conscious and oriented to place, time, and persons. His vital parameters likesuch as respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation etc. were within normal limits. There was no tenderness over chest, abdomen, pelvis, and long bones on complete systemic examination of the patient done with adequate exposure. On local examination of the neck (with head stabilized as per standard ATLS protocol), there was a midline bony tenderness with painful and restricted neck motion. As Ccervical (write full forms) spine injury was suspected, a Philadelphia collar was applied around the neck. He had weak hand grip in the right side with motor weakness in the shoulder abduction and forward flexion (Power as per Medical Research Council (write full forms) grading-2/5), with ipsilateral triceps (C7) and biceps (C5) weakness (each 3/5).() (it would be better if you mention the power examination based on myotomes). The skin sensation was decreased in C5 to T1 dermatomes in the same side. On neurological examination in the lower limb, the power in hip flexor, knee extensor, ankle dorsi-flexor, and plantar-flexor was 5/5 on both side with intact sensation in each dermatome below T2 including perianal sensation. Planter response was equivocal. The other deep tendon reflexes and superficial reflexes of both lower limbs were normal. The patient was able to feel the sensation of catheter on gentle pull on indwelling Foley’’s catheter (Catheter Tug Test). (Please write complete neurological exam with reflexes and if there were any other injuries seen on examination).

Almost two-thirds of cervical spine injuries occur within the sub-axial cervical spine, with dislocations occurring most commonly at C5–-C6 and C6–-C7 levels. Cervical facet dislocation usually occurs as a result of combined flexion and distraction forces. [6].

Injury in this zone ranges from ligamentous insufficiency to unstable fracture, involving both posterior and anterior structures in the spinal column. This segment of the spine is highly vulnerable to injury as it is greatly mobile and at the proximal end it carries the weight of the head (12-–15 pounds). Moreover, it has to bear great amount of force in acceleration and deceleration injuries [7].

Fracture dislocation of the cervical spine is a devastating injury and there is high probability of neurological deficit. The patient might have simple root injuries, as was in our case (C5, C6, and C7 root injuries), to a devastating complete neurological dysfunction (quadriplegia) [8].

In upper cervical spine, vertebral canal size is greater and hence neurological deficit less commonly happens. Whenever there is neural injury at that level, the patient is usually not compatible with independent life as there would be paralysis of phrenic nerves and subsequent respiratory apnea ensues [9].

In contrast, in sub-axial cervical spine, the size of the canal decreases and any dislocation has a great potential to cause severe cord injury with quadriplegia.

In our case, despite being spondyloptotic displacement at the C5 and C6 level, there were only root injuries in the right side. The spinal cord injury was not there, and hence, rest of the limbs were unaffected with preservation of patient’s ambulatory status. It was theorized that on account of the floating lateral mass in the one side and pedicle fracture in the other side, the posterior elements were separated from the vertebral body in anterior side and hence even after great displacement of the proximal vertebral body, the size of vertebral canal was paradoxically increased. The increased canal saved the patient from a major spinal cord injury.

Like any other dislocation, this injury also has to be treated with reduction (closed or open) and stabilization. There is no consensus as to conservatively manage or one should do operative stabilization of the injury. But However, scientific community is favoring operative early stabilization and rehabilitation of the patients as there are complications of chronic bed recumbencies. In our case, we could do the surgery within 48 hours of the injury and reduction was easy. Complete reduction, cord decompression, and rigid stabilization with the early start of the rehabilitation greatly helped the patient to achieve full neurological recovery without complications. This type of injury demands diligent patient management with focus on preservation of neurological function as reduction and operative process itself is fraught with complications.

Subaxial cervical spine (C3-7) injuries are among the most common and devastating axial skeleton injuries associated with polytrauma patients. These patients presents to the emergency department with varying degree of neurological compromise. Management varies from conservative to surgical intervention in the form of reduction and stabilization. Early surgical intervention results in near complete neurological recovery.