<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="case-report" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Orthop Case Reports</journal-id>
<journal-title>Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2250-0685</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2321-3817</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JOCR-12-86</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i12.3476</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Case Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Case ReportSubtrochanteric Fracture after Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture Using the Hansson Pinloc System: A Case Report</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>Atsuhisa</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yasui</surname>
<given-names>Tetsuro</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miki</surname>
<given-names>Yuji</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>Shigeru</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizunokuchi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>Address of Correspondence:</bold> Dr. Atsuhisa Yamada, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 5-1-1 Takatsu-Ku Futago, 213-8507 Kawasaki-Shi, Kanagawa, Japan. E-mail: <email xlink:href="keatonyamaatsu@yahoo.co.jp">keatonyamaatsu@yahoo.co.jp</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<issue>12</issue>
<fpage>86</fpage>
<lpage>89</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><month>11</month><year>2022</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0">
<p>This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Introduction:</title>
<p>Hansson Pinloc system consists of three pins locking into a plate. In biomechanical trials, the novel plate design with its pin configuration enhanced torsional stability. Hansson Pinloc has been used for femoral neck fracture in some countries including Sweden and Japan. Recently, the outcome of a randomized clinical study comparing Hansson Pinloc and conventional Hansson pins was published. However, subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using Hansson Pinloc has not been reported in the English literature including the above report. Only several Japanese literatures reported some cases with this post-operative complication. We present a case with subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using Hansson Pinloc.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Case Report:</title>
<p>Subtrochanteric fractures after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures are rare but severe complications. We present our experience of this complication after internal fixation using Hansson Pinloc system which is a new design implant for femoral neck fracture. A 67-year-old woman was diagnosed with a femoral neck fracture of Garden stage I after a fall. She underwent closed reduction and internal fixation using Hansson Pinloc system. At 4 weeks after surgery, she suffered subtrochanteric fracture without any episode of trauma. The patient underwent removal of the instrumentation and internal fixation with a long femoral nail. We get in trouble with removing Hansson Pinloc system due to secondary fracture, and of bone defect. 9 weeks after the second surgery, the patient could get bone union and walk using double T-canes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Conclusion:</title>
<p>Surgeons should be cognizant of this post-operative complication before using this system. In osteosynthesis of the femoral neck fracture using Hansson Pinloc, we should keep in mind that subtrochanteric fracture is a possible post-operative complication.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Femoral neck fracture</kwd>
<kwd>Osteosynthesis</kwd>
<kwd>Post-operative complication</kwd>
<kwd>Subtrochanteric fracture</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<boxed-text>
<title>Learning Point of the Article:</title>
<p>In osteosynthesis of the femoral neck fracture using Pinloc, we should keep in mind that subtrochanteric fracture is a possible post-operative complication.</p>
</boxed-text>
<sec id="sec1-1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Subtrochanteric fractures after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures are rare but severe complications. Hansson Pinloc system (Pinloc) consists of three pins locking into a plate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). In biomechanical trials, the novel plate design with its pin configuration enhanced torsional stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>]. Pinloc has been used for femoral neck fracture in some countries including Sweden and Japan. Recently, the outcome of a randomized clinical study comparing Pinloc and conventional Hansson pins was published [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. However, subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using Pinloc has not been reported in the English literature including the above report. Only several Japanese literatures reported some cases with this post-operative complication. We present a case with subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using Pinloc.</p>
<fig id="F1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Structure of the Hansson Pinloc system (Swemac, Link&#x00F6;ping, Sweden). The system consists of three pins locked into a plate. This structure strengthens rotational resistance.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-2">
<title>Case Presentation</title>
<p>A 67-year-old woman (164 cm, 40.4 kg) fell while walking and injured her right hip. She visited our hospital on the same day. The first X-ray showed a Garden stage I fracture in the right femoral neck (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>). Osteosynthesis was performed with Pinloc 3 days after she sustained the injury (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>). She was discharged 3 weeks after surgery, walking with a cane. One week after discharge, she developed sudden severe pain in the right hip on standing up. She was unable to walk and was transferred to our hospital by ambulance. The X-ray revealed a fresh subtrochanteric fracture in the femur (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>). We performed a second surgery as described below on the 3rd day after this subtrochanteric fracture was sustained (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray at the first injury. Displaced fracture of the right femoral neck.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray after the first surgery. Osteosynthesis using Pinloc.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray after the second injury. Subtrochanteric fracture with no preceding trauma.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray just after the second surgery. New fracture of the proximal femur.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="sec2-1">
<title>Findings at the second surgery</title>
<p>The patient was placed in supine position on the traction table, and the displacement of fracture site was examined using an image intensifier. Displacement was mild on the frontal view, but the proximal fragment was extremely displaced anteriorly on the lateral view. We attempted closed reduction but could not achieve satisfactory reduction. The skin incision was elongated to expose the fracture site better. We then lifted the distal fragment and reduced anatomically under direct view. After open reduction, we fixed the fragments with a wire temporarily. Then, after the hook on the upper rear side pin of the Pinloc was withdrawn, we tried to remove the pin using the T-handle, as instructed by the manufacturer. At that point, a new fracture occurred at the distal end of the fragment. All three hooks were withdrawn back into the pins and the plate was pulled out with all of the pins as one unit.</p>
<p>There was a bony defect in the femoral neck and head after removal of the implant. This was filled with hydroxyapatite bone cement (Lagfix; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). We made another skin incision over the greater trochanter and inserted an intramedullary nail (T2 reconstruction nail; Stryker). The hip screws were driven into the proximal fragment, avoiding the bony defect site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-2">
<title>Post-operative course</title>
<p>After non-weight-bearing for 3 weeks, we allowed the patient to bear weight as tolerable. She could walk with double crutches by 9 weeks after surgery and was discharged home. X-ray at the last follow-up showed no migration or loosening of the implant at 2 months after the second surgery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Fig. 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>X-ray at the last visit. No cutout or loosening of the implant at 2 months after the second surgery.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-3" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Internal fixation for femoral neck fracture is commonly performed using the cannulated cancellous hip system or Hansson Pinloc System. The rates of subtrochanteric fracture after osteosynthesis with these systems have been reported to be 1&#x2013;3&#x0025; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>]. Risk factors for subtrochanteric fracture after surgery have been reported, as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]: (1) Screws or pins inserted below the lesser trochanter; (2) screws or pins positioned too close to each other; (3) three screws that form a pyramid, with the apex directed proximally; (4) reinsertion of the guide wire more than once; and (5) the patient has osteoporosis. We considered each of these risk factors for trochanteric fracture as it related to our case. Post-operative X-ray revealed that the distal pin had been inserted above the distal end of the lesser trochanter. Based on the structure of the Pinloc, all three pins had not been positioned too close to each other, and they did not form a pyramid with the apex directed proximally. Furthermore, the guide pin was not reinserted more than once. In terms of osteoporosis, a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan had given a T score of &#x2212;4.1 in the lumbar spine and &#x2212;3.0 in the femur. The patient thus had severe osteoporosis but had not yet been treated. There was, therefore, a possibility that bone fragility due to severe osteoporosis had caused the subtrochanteric fracture after surgery.</p>
<p>Kalland et al. reported on outcomes of osteosynthesis using Pinloc in a prospective control study and stated that the three pins connected to the lateral plate of Pinloc may exert increased stress on the subtrochanteric region, leading to a higher rate of subtrochanteric fracture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. They showed that three new fractures occurred in 169 cases treated with Pinloc but did not clarify whether these were subtrochanteric or other fractures. Furthermore, in a retrospective study on 40 patients treated with Pinloc, no subtrochanteric fracture was reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports in the English literature on this complication.</p>
<p>The Japanese literature has five reports on subtrochanteric fracture after osteosynthesis using Pinloc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>]. In these cases, all the patients were women, and re-fracture occurred within 1 month after surgery; three patients had subtrochanteric fracture with no preceding episode of trauma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Urata et al. reported that subtrochanteric fracture with no preceding trauma occurred in one of 18 patients who had internal fixation with Pinloc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]. They cautioned that there is a higher risk of subtrochanteric fracture with Pinloc compared with other implants. In our case, the patient had subtrochanteric fracture with no trauma. Therefore, attention should be paid to the probability of this fracture as a post-operative complication when using Pinloc in patients with osteoporosis. Only one report has described a method to avoid this complication; Isozumi et al. proposed downsizing the diameter of the guide pin from 3.2 mm (the size of a Pinloc pin) to 2.4 mm (the size of a conventional Hansson pin) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Reports on subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using Pinloc.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g007.tif"/>
</table-wrap>
<p>We discuss the treatment strategy for subtrochanteric fracture after osteosynthesis for femoral neck fracture. Several reports have described various osteosynthesis implants such as compression hip screw, Ender nail, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and intramedullary nail. In our case, the second surgery had been performed 4 weeks after the initial procedure for femoral neck fracture. Therefore, we assumed that bone healing was incomplete, and proceeded with internal fixation using an intramedullary nail, which could fix both the femoral neck and the subtrochanteric fracture. At the second surgery, a new fracture occurred when we attempted to remove the Pinloc. To prevent this complication in other cases, we recommend that surgeons first withdraw all three hooks in the pins, and then pull out all three pins with the plate as one unit. Furthermore, any bony defect after removing the Pinloc should be adequately addressed. Tani et al. reported that the bony defect occupied about 25&#x0025; of a femoral neck cross-section on computed tomography, so the defect needed to be refilled. In our case, we filled the bony defect with artificial bone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-4" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Surgeons should be cognizant of this post-operative complication before using Pinloc. Future studies are needed to clarify the frequency of subtrochanteric fracture after internal fixation using this system. In osteosynthesis of the femoral neck fracture using Pinloc, we should keep in mind that subtrochanteric fracture is a possible post-operative complication.</p>
<boxed-text>
<title>Clinical Message</title>
<p>Subtrochanteric fractures after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures are rare but severe complications. Pinloc is new device, in which improved torsional stability though it may stress on the subtrochanteric region. In osteosynthesis of the femoral neck fracture using Pinloc, we should keep in mind that subtrochanteric fracture is a possible post-operative complication.</p>
</boxed-text>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<bio>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g008.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g009.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g010.tif"/></p>
<p><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JOCR-12-86-g011.tif"/></p>
</bio>
<ref-list>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brattgjerda</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loferer</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niratisairaka</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Str&#248;ms&#248;ec</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Increased torsional stability by a novel femoral neck locking plate. The role of plate design and pin configuration in a synthetic bone block model</article-title>
<source>Clin Biomech</source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<fpage>28</fpage>
<lpage>35</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kalland</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#197;berg</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berggren</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullman</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snellman</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jonsson</surname>
<given-names>KB</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Similar outcome of femoral neck fractures treated with Pinloc or Hansson Pins:1-year data from a multicenter randomized clinical study on 439 patients</article-title>
<source>Acta Orthop</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>90</volume>
<fpage>542</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname>
<given-names>SP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meffert</surname>
<given-names>RH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fracture:A rare but severe complication after screw fixation of femoral neck fractures in the elderly</article-title>
<source>Acta Orthop Belg</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<fpage>778</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kloen</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rubel</surname>
<given-names>IF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyden</surname>
<given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Helfet</surname>
<given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fracture after cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures:A report of four cases</article-title>
<source>J Orthop Trauma</source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<fpage>225</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pelet</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leyvraz</surname>
<given-names>PF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garofalo</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borens</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouhsine</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Sub-or intertrochanteric fracture following screw fixation of an intracapsular proximal femoral fracture:True complication or technical error&#x003F;</article-title>
<source>Swiss Surg</source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<fpage>82</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MacEachern</surname>
<given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heyse-Moore</surname>
<given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>RN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur through the track of the lower Garden screw treatment with a Richards sliding screw</article-title>
<source>Injury</source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<fpage>337</fpage>
<lpage>40</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Karr</surname>
<given-names>RK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwab</surname>
<given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fracture as a complication of proximal femoral pinning</article-title>
<source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>194</volume>
<fpage>214</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<label>8</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oakey</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stover</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Summers</surname>
<given-names>HD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sartori</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Havey</surname>
<given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patwardhan</surname>
<given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation&#x003F;</article-title>
<source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>443</volume>
<fpage>302</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<label>9</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garden</surname>
<given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Low angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck</article-title>
<source>J Bone Joint Surg</source>
<year>1961</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<fpage>647</fpage>
<lpage>63</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<label>10</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kobayashi</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nonomiya</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Undisplaced femoral neck fractures need a closed reduction before internal fixation</article-title>
<source>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<fpage>73</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<label>11</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Urata</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirai</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hukumoto</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Treatment of the femoral neck fracture with Hansson Pinloc</article-title>
<source>J Jpn Soc Fracture Repair</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<fpage>859</fpage>
<lpage>62</lpage>
<comment>(In Japanese)</comment>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<label>12</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Isozumi</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoshino</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukuda</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iwata</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fracture after ORIF with Hansson Pinloc</article-title>
<source>J Jpn Soc Fracture Repair</source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<fpage>S236</fpage>
<comment>(In Japanese)</comment>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<label>13</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tani</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirota</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric femoral fracture after fixation of femoral neck fracture with Hansson Pinloc System</article-title>
<source>J Jpn Soc Fracture Repair</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<fpage>147</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<comment>(In Japanese)</comment>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<label>14</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Senda</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arima</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oka</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The subtrochanteric femur fracture after pin fixation of femoral neck fracture. Report one case</article-title>
<source>J Chugoku Shikoku Orthop Assoc</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<fpage>267</fpage>
<lpage>70</lpage>
<comment>(In Japanese)</comment>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<label>15</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suzuki</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dairaku</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemoto</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuki</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayashi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takagi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Subtrochanteric fracture after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fracture with Hansson Pinloc&#174;system:A case report</article-title>
<source>Tohoku J Orthop Traumatol</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<fpage>107</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<comment>(In Japanese)</comment>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p><bold>Conflict of Interest:</bold> None</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="supported-by">
<p><bold>Source of Support:</bold> None</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p><bold>Consent:</bold> The authors confirm that informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
