[box type=”bio”] Learning Point of the Article: [/box]
Hoffa fracture needs CT evaluation to prevent misdiagnosis and to plan for the different options of surgical intervention.
Case Report | Volume 11 | Issue 2 | JOCR February 2021 | Page 112-118 | Rajni Ranjan, Rakesh Kumar, Madhan Jeyaraman, Rashmi Jain, Dushyant Chaudhary, Sudhir Kumar. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i02.2050
Authors: Rajni Ranjan[1], Rakesh Kumar[1], Madhan Jeyaraman[1], Rashmi Jain[1], Dushyant Chaudhary[1], Sudhir Kumar[1]
[1]Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Madhan Jeyaraman,
Department of Orthopedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh – 201 306, India.
E-mail: madhanjeyaraman@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Hoffa fractures are the fractures of the femoral condyles in the coronal planes. These are uncommon in adults and notably rarer in pediatric population. In this fracture, either one or both the femoral condyles may get involved following the injury. Such rare clinical entity warrants a high index of suspicion with apt radiological corroboration for meticulously diagnosing and planning out the treatment.
Case Report: We report a rare case of Hoffa fracture involving the medial femoral condyle of right knee and undisplaced right patella fracture in a 6-year-old girl. The radiological investigations (radiographs and computed tomography [CT] scan) were done and her leg was immobilized by above knee posterior slab. Our treatment plan included surgical intervention to do open reduction and internal fixation using k-wires and two 4.5 mm partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws and was done with due care to prevent any damage to epiphysis. No signs of osteonecrosis, heterotopic ossification or physeal growth arrest in radiograph taken at 10th month were noted. The child is still under follow-up.
Conclusion: Hoffa fracture is a rare variety and the diagnosis of the same warrant a higher index of suspicion with more watchful eye. CT-scan firmly establishes the missed diagnosis and notably provides with the detailed configuration of the fracture to guide the treatment plan. Surgical intervention (open reduction and fixation or arthroscopy based procedures) is essential over the non-operative treatment to alleviate complications.
Keywords: Hoffa fracture, femoral condyles, coronal plane.
Introduction
Coronal fracture of distal femur are is uncommon in adults and indeed rarer in children [1]. Fractures involving femoral condyles in coronal plane are referred as Hoffa fractures [2]. The fracture was firstly described by Hoffa in 1904 [3]. The Hoffa fracture may involve one or both of the condyles. Femoral condylar fractures account for about 0.65% of all the femoral fractures [4]. These fractures are classified as type B 3.2 as per the AO classification, respectively. These fractures often get missed in routine radiographs of distal femur. The treating clinician must have a high index of suspicion to diagnose these rare fractures. Computed Tomography (CT) scan is mandatory in view of not missing the diagnosis of this fracture especially in those who have sustained high energy injury and with lipohaemarthrosis. The details on the configuration of fracture provided by CT scan is are mandatory to plan out the surgical procedures [5]. As it is an intra-articular fracture, open reduction and internal fixation is are needed for a better clinical and functional outcome. Most published data have shown inferior results for managing such fractures with non-operative treatment [4]. In current literature, Hoffa fracture in skeletally immature patients comprise only of case reports. The goal of this article, after obtaining patient’s attender’s informed and written consent, is to report a case of 6- year- old girl with Hoffa fracture of medial femoral condyle and to provide a systematic review of the literature on Hoffa fractures in paediatric population.
Case Report
A six 6- year- old girl presented to our emergency department with pain and swelling in the right knee along with inability to stand and walk. The attendant gave history of fall from height approximately 12 feet on her bent knees. On examination, the right knee was tender, swollen, and with multiple abrasions. The movements of her right knee were restricted and painful. Distal neurovascular status was intact. The patient was stable without any associated injuries. The patient was conscious and oriented. The plain radiograph of right knee revealed Hoffa fracture of medial femoral condyle as shown in (Fig. 1). 
CT scan of the right knee was performed to understand the fracture configuration, which revealed the comminutions at the fracture site as shown in (Fig. 2, 3a, 3b). 
The patient was immobilized with above knee posterior slab and scheduled for operative intervention. Informed and written consent was obtained from her parents for the same. Under general anaesthesia, the clinical examination showed varus instability in mid flexion range but there was no anteroposterior instability. Medial approach was used to access the fracture site. The fracture was reduced and held with k wires as shown in (Fig. 4a, 4b). Thereafter, the fracture was fixed using two 4.5 mm partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws as shown in (Fig. 5a, 5b).
Screws were passed from posterior to anterior with due care to prevent any damage to epiphysis. Immediate post-operative radiograph was taken and the patient was kept in above knee posterior slab for initial three 3 weeks postoperatively as shown in (Fig. 6).
Gradual active knee mobilization was started after 3 weeks. The radiographs taken on 6th post-operative week showed the signs of fracture union. The patient was allowed partial weight bearing at 8 weeks and full weight bearing at 10 weeks. At 6th month follow- up, the patient had 0° to –110° of flexion with no signs of varus/valgus instability as shown in (Fig. 7). There were no signs of osteonecrosis, heterotopic ossification, or physeal growth arrest in radiograph taken at 10th month as shown in (Fig. 8). The child is still under follow- up.
Discussion
In view of review of literature on the mentioned subject, we searched following electronic databases- PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar; for “Hoffa fracture” in paediatric population using the keywords “Hoffa Fracture”, “Paediatric”, “Skeletally Immature,” and “coronal fracture of femoral condyle”. Only 13 case reports of Hoffa fracture in skeletally immature patients were found (as mentioned in Table 1). First case was reported in 2000 by McDonough in an 8- year- old child [6]. Notably, Hoffa fractures are rarer in this age group [7]. Among paediatric age group, the most common coronal fracture is lateral condyle followed by bicondylar fracture and medial femoral condyle is the least common. The aforementioned trend is similar in adults [8]. Lateral condyle is mostly fractured due to presence of physiological genu valgum [7]. Till date, only three cases of medial Hoffa fracture have been reported in paediatric age group and hereby we aim to report the fourth case.
The injury mechanism of Hoffa fracture ranges from low energy trauma to high energy trauma; however, it is not well understood specifically [17]. Road traffic accident is the most common cause of this type of fracture in children as likewise in adults. Fall from height, athletic injuries are other modes of such injury. It has been hypothesized that an axial load to the femoral condyle with the knee in 90 degrees or a greater amount of flexion produces coronal fracture of femoral condyle [2]. As mentioned above, lateral condyle femoral fractures are most commonly witnessed due to physiological genu valgum in comparison to medial condyle [7]. On the other hand, Hoffa fractures involving both the condyles have no correlation with knee valgus, rather occurs due to forces directed posteriorly and upward [18]. In few patients, Hoffa fracture may also be associated with fracture of the patella occurring as an impact of combination of direct trauma and plausible sudden quadriceps injury witnessed indirectly. Apart from this, skeletally immature and osteoporotic population may have Hoffa fracture following low-energy trauma [11]. However, in our case, the child had a Hoffa fracture involving right medial femoral condyle and undisplaced vertical fracture of right patella due to sustained high-energy trauma (fall from height) without any significant open injury in either leg or any other systemic injury. In addition, it can also result as an iatrogenic injury during surgical reconstructive procedures of anterior cruciate ligament and thereby this aspect too requires significant attention of operating team [17]. Notably, the diagnosis of Hoffa fracture is exquisitely challenging. The earliest diagnosis of such rarer clinical entities solely relies on the vigilant eyes and alert mind of the treating surgeon who meticulously relate presented history of trauma and positive clinical signs with apt findings of radiological investigations. The clinical manifestations locally noted in Hoffa fracture are pain, swelling, change in skin color with or without any skin defect, and limited mobility of the knee joint [19]. In some patients, positive floating patella test , anterior and posterior drawer test, and medial or lateral stress test were reported positive [17]. Moreover, it has also been reported that people with Hoffa fracture presents with instability when flexed at 30° but not witnessed in straightened leg while being examined under general anaesthesia [20]. With respect to our case, child’s right knee was tender, swollen with multiple abrasions and movements were restricted and painful. Indeed, her distal neurovascular status was intact and none of the stated tests were found positive. However, examination under general anaesthesia showed varus instability in mid flexion range but there was no anteroposterior instability. The radiological examination should include evaluation of anteroposterior, lateral, oblique, and stress views of the knee in purview of not missing upon the diagnosis of Hoffa fracture especially non-displaced variety. Tripathy et al. reported a case wherein patient reported to author after 4 months of injury. First treating physician missed the fracture by only getting one plane radiograph [8]. Further, it has been noted that high energy trauma causing medial condylar Hoffa fracture is frequently associated with other fractures involving tibia, both the condyles, intercondylare, supracondylare, patella, dislocation of knee, shaft of femur, or pelvis may present with excruciating pain in combination and thereby culminate into the missed diagnosis of Hoffa fracture [17]. We believe that such instances can be invariably overcome with a high index of suspicion wherein radiographs are insufficient to diagnose and therefore it is wiser to direct for the gold standard investigation, that is, i.e. CT scan for the same [21]. The CT- scan findings of our case revealed the comminutions at the fracture site, respectively. According to CT- based classification of Hoffa fracture as proposed by Chandrabose et al., [22] our case belongs to type 2b. In addition, it is worthwhile to mention that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will also serve as useful in paediatric Hoffa fracture provided suspecting of injury to physis and ligaments [8]. The aim of the treatment of these fractures is to reduce the fracture anatomically and provide stable fixation for an early mobilization. This can be achieved either conservatively or surgically; however, the former generally brings about poor outcomes associated with malunion, non-union, and avascular necrosis [1, 10]. Open reduction and internal fixation is are the choice for both displaced and undisplaced fracture. Surgical consideration and approach (as mentioned in Table 2) allowing complete exposure of the fracture is subjected to the location, severity, and configuration of the Hoffa fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was were done in most of the reported cases. Flangin et al. did diagnostic arthroscopy of knee and followed by open arthrotomy, reduction, and internal fixation [10]. Arthroscopic assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation was were done by Lal et al. They advocated arthroscopic assisted procedure minimizes dissection of soft tissue, loss of blood, and operative time [7]. We treated medial Hoffa fracture as diagnosed in our case with open reduction and internal fixation using k-wires and two 4.5 mm partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws. Medial approach was used to access the fracture site and due care was taken for preventing any injury to epiphysis while fixing the reduced fracture. For the same reason, screws were passed from posterior to anterior. As far as our understanding, literature lacks clinical comparison on the fixation methods of Hoffa fracture. Indeed, selection of type of screws along with decision to combine with antigliding plates and direction of its application are subjected to fracture configuration and patient profile. Further, it is important to note that instability at fracture site have higher chances of non-union with chronic pain and disability [10]. McDonough et al. reported non-union of Hoffa fracture where injury took place 5 years back [6]. Be that as it may, such injury in a paediatric age group postures uncommon issues because of the nearness of an open physis [8, 17, 21]. To reiterate, a high index of suspicion is much needed in similar cases and in fact demands routine practice of evaluating for Hoffa fractures as a part of examining the lower limb and pelvis of the case irrespective of injury. Such improvised practice will extremely prove fruitful for not missing its diagnosis and will further facilitate to plan for an appropriate treatment of the case with nullified complications. Nevertheless, rehabilitative protocol with range of motion (ROM) exercises during post-operative course supplements in achieving a better functional outcome.
Conclusion
Hoffa fractures being rarer in paediatric population demands careful evaluation of all the cases involving knee joints with a higher index of suspicion for the earliest diagnosis. CT scan serves as the mainstay and corroborate for the same. Management depends upon the fracture configuration but it is worth imbibing that open reduction and internal fixation is needed for a better clinical and functional outcome in comparison to conservative treatment plan.
Clinical Message
Hoffa fracture, the fracture of femoral condyles in coronal plane, needs CT evaluation to prevent misdiagnosis, to study the fracture configuration, and to plan for the different options of surgical intervention.
References
1. Julfiqar, Huda N, Pant A. Paediatric conjoint bicondylar Hoffa fracture with patellar tendon injury: An unusual pattern of injury. Chin J Traumatol 2019;22:246-8.
2. White EA, Matcuk GR, Schein A, Skalski M, Marecek GS, Maracek GS, et al. Coronal plane fracture of the femoral condyles: Anatomy, injury patterns, and approach to management of the Hoffa fragment. Skeletal Radiol 2015;44:37-43.
3. Harna B, Goel A, Singh P, Sabat D. Pediatric conjoint Hoffa’s fracture: An uncommon injury and review of literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017;8:353-4.
4. Patel PB, Tejwani NC. The Hoffa fracture: Coronal fracture of the femoral condyle a review of literature. J Orthop 2018;15:726-31.
5. Arastu MH, Kokke MC, Duffy PJ, Korley RE, Buckley RE. Coronal plane partial articular fractures of the distal femoral condyle: Current concepts in management. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1165-71.
6. McDonough PW, Bernstein RM. Nonunion of a Hoffa fracture in a child. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:519-21.
7. Lal H, Bansal P, Khare R, Mittal D. Conjoint bicondylar Hoffa fracture in a child: A rare variant treated by minimally invasive approach. J Orthop Traumatol 2011;12:111-4.
8. Tripathy SK, Aggarwal A, Patel S, Goyal T, Priya N. Neglected Hoffa fracture in a child. J Pediatr Orthop B 2013;22:339-43.
9. Kumar R, Malhotra R. The Hoffa fracture: Three case reports. J Orthop Surg 2001;9:47-51.
10. Flanagin BA, Cruz AI, Medvecky MJ. Hoffa fracture in a 14-year-old. Orthopedics 2011;34:138.
11. Potini VC, Gehrmann RM. Intra-articular dislocation of the patella with associated Hoffa fracture in a skeletally immature patient. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2015;44:E195-8.
12. Elazab A. Missed Hoffa fracture in skeletally immature patient complicated by non-union pseudoarthrosis: Case report and review of literature. Orthop Rheumatol Open Access J 2019;15:555916.
13. Kondreddi V, Yalamanchili RK, Ravi Kiran K. Bicondylar Hoffa’s fracture with patellar dislocation-a rare case. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2014;5:38-41.
14. Bali K, Mootha AK, Prabhakar S, Dhillon MS. Isolated Hoffa fracture of the medial femoral condyle in a skeletally immature patient. Bull NYU Hosp Joint Dis 2011;69:335-8.
15. Salunke A, Nambi GI, Singh S, Menon P, Girish GN, Vachalam D. Hoffa’s fracture with ipsilateral fibular fracture in a 16-year-old girl: An approach to a rare injury. Chin J Traumatol 2015;18:178-80.
16. AlKhalife YI, Alshammari AN, Abouelnaga MA. Hoffa’s fracture of the medial femoral condyle in a child treated with open reduction and internal fixation: A case report. Trauma Case Rep 2018;14:20-6.
17. Zhou Y, Pan Y, Wang Q, Hou Z, Chen W. Hoffa fracture of the femoral condyle: Injury mechanism, classification, diagnosis, and treatment. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14633.
18. Ul Haq R, Modi P, Dhammi I, Jain AK, Mishra P. Conjoint bicondylar Hoffa fracture in an adult. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:302-6.
19. Mootha AK, Majety P, Kumar V. Undiagnosed Hoffa fracture of medial femoral condyle presenting as chronic pain in a post-polio limb. Chin J Traumatol 2014;17:180-2.
20. Wagih AM. Arthroscopic management of a posterior femoral condyle (Hoffa) fracture: Surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech 2015;4:e299-303.
21. Dhillon MS, Mootha AK, Bali K, Prabhakar S, Dhatt SS, Kumar V. Coronal fractures of the medial femoral condyle: A series of 6 cases and review of literature. Musculoskelet Surg 2012;96:49-54.
22. Chandrabose R, Saha S, Kumar H, Tapadiya N, Hd B. A computed tomography-based classification of Hoffa fracture: Surgical treatment considerations and prognostic outcome with assessment of reproducibility. J Orthop 2019;20:21-7.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Dr. Rajni Ranjan | Dr. Rakesh Kumar | Dr. Madhan Jeyaraman | Dr. Rashmi Jain | Dr. Dushyant Chaudhary | Dr. Sudhir Kumar |
| How to Cite This Article: Ranjan R, Kumar R, Jeyaraman M, Jain R, Chaudhary D, Kumar S. Hoffa fracture in skeletally immature patients: A case report and review of literature. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2021 February;11(2): 112-118. |
[Full Text HTML] [Full Text PDF] [XML]
[rate_this_page]
Dear Reader, We are very excited about New Features in JOCR. Please do let us know what you think by Clicking on the Sliding “Feedback Form” button on the <<< left of the page or sending a mail to us at editor.jocr@gmail.com
