ISSN Number - pISSN 2250 – 0685 | eISSN 2321-3817

Your Advertisement

The Joshi External Stabilization System: Simple yet Versatile

Editorial
[https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4788]
PDF Downloaded : 14 Fulltext Viewed : 57 views
CROSSMARK LOGO

The Joshi External Stabilization System: Simple yet Versatile

Learning Point of the Article :
The Joshi External Stabilization System is a simple, easy system which is not just limited to applications in hand and foot surgery but also in other trauma and reconstructive surgeries. The need of the hour is generation of awareness regarding its versatility as well as generating more quality evidence for its use.
Editorial | Volume 14 | Issue 10 | JOCR October 2024 | Page 1-3 | Siddhartha Sinha [1], Arvind Kumar [2], Sandeep Kumar [1], Owais A Qureshi [1], Javed Jameel [1], Ashok Shyam [3]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4788
Authors: Siddhartha Sinha [1], Arvind Kumar [2], Sandeep Kumar [1], Owais A Qureshi [1], Javed Jameel [1], Ashok Shyam [3]
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India,
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
[3] Department of Orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Siddhartha Sinha, Department of Orthopaedics, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi 1110062, India. Email: siddharthasinha87@gmail.com
Article Received : 2024-07-02,
Article Accepted : 2024-09-04
Editorial

The Joshi external stabilization system (JESS) is a Kirschner wire and link-based external stabilization system which was initially developed by Prof B.B Joshi for the management of industrial hand injuries [1]. The ease of application and quick learning curve have made it a very attractive option for orthopedic surgeons who are often faced with a dilemma regarding management of complex clinical situations. Using nail and plates are often the solution for most trauma cases. This editorial aims to illustrate the relevance of JESS for an Orthopaedic Surgeon.
The JESS fixator is based on ligamentotaxis, distraction histogenesis, and segmental fixaton, which is relatively minimally invasive. Simple components, modularity and light weight make it an ideal tool for any orthopedic surgeon to add to their skill set. The versatility of indications ranges from trauma, deformity corrections, as well as reconstructive surgeries. With a relatively high safety profile and easy application, it becomes a powerful tool, especially in resource-limited settings. These principles follow the vision of Prof Joshi, who conceptualized a system which can be easily applied by any surgeon with minimum instrumentation at places with limited resources.
Irrespective of the indication, the construct aims to maximize the construct stability and decrease stress at the pin-bone interface by pre-tensioning the pins. It allows for a shorter hospital stay, early initiation of physiotherapy and return to work. There are relatively less infections due to less disruption of the skin compared to a plate or nail. External fixation also allows for improved tissue healing, better wound management, and easy removal.
The use of the JESS fixator in hand and foot injuries as well as correction in cases of congenital talipes equinovarus has widespread acceptance with many authors [2-5]. Most surgeons, however, have limited awareness regarding its other indications. The system can be used to fix difficult proximal humerus fractures (Fig. 1) and proximal tibia fractures (Fig. 2) in specific indications with promising results [6-11]. However, the evidence regarding JESS in these fractures is limited and of relatively poor quality.
Despite such advantages, concerns regarding cosmesis are a common reason for patients not opting for the fixator. Its inability to reduce fractures, possible impalement to tendon, nerves, and vessels if safe zones are not followed remain a major concern with many. These can be reduced by simply planning the case in advance. The biggest drawback is the inability of this system to reduce fractures. The JESS fixator is not a tool which can be used for reduction of a displaced fracture like in the cases of plates or screws. However, the system is biomechanically strong enough to able to hold a well reduced fracture. The implications of this are that the surgeon may possibly need to perform an open reduction or use additional implants like screws for reducing the fracture before applying the fixator
As surgeons, we often need to optimize the management of patients not only in terms of early and appropriate surgery but also economically. The JESS fixator is an excellent and versatile tool for both the young and the experienced surgeons. Technology and artificial intelligence breakthroughs are driving innovation and techniques in orthopedics but it is imperative to maintain context. Not everyone has or will have access to the latest technology and as we all have experienced at some point, another technology may fail us at the most crucial steps. Keeping it simple is often the key. To conclude, the JESS system is a simple, easy system which is not only just limited to applications in hand and foot surgery but also in other trauma and reconstructive surgeries. The need of the hour is generation of awareness regarding its versatility as well as generating more quality evidence for its use.

References

  • 1.
    Joshi B. Joshi’s External Stabilization System (JESS): A simple mini external fixator for the management of hand trauma and its sequels. Injury 1997;3:244. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.
    Badhwar KK. A comparison of outcome of K-wires and JESS in treatment of metacarpal fractures. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2019;7:184-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.
    Venkatesh V, Maruti C. Functional outcome of mini-external fixator for hand in a rural tertiary care hospital. Int J Orthop 2020;6:49-53. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.
    Rahman H, Deka BK. Management of mangled hand injuries with JESS fixator in a tertiary care hospital in North East India: A prospective study. J Orthop 2022;34:310-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.
    Ajmera A, Jain S, Singh AK, Solanki M, Verma A. Simultaneous lateral column shortening along with differential distraction by Joshi’s external stabilization system for rigid neglected clubfoot correction. J Pediatr Orthop B 2019;28:579-85. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.
    Kushwaha SS, Thakur A, Khan YS, Verma A, Mohammed F, Kumar A. Evaluation of functional outcome of management of proximal humerus fractures by different treatment modalities. J Clin Diagn Res 2020;14:RC01-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.
    Kandel PR, Shrestha B, Shrestha KM, Shrestha S, Chhetri P. Functional outcome of proximal humerus fracture managed surgically by Joshi’s external stabilizing system. J Univ Coll Med Sci 2021;9:8-13. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.
    Thambusamy G, Subramanian K, Mathialagan S, Chockalingam B, Muthu S. 6-Pin technique Joshi external stabilization system fixation for proximal humerus fractures-a case series. J Orthop Case Rep 2023;13:65. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.
    Huda N, Bishnoi S, Shahid M, Keshav K, Altaf D, Kumar K. Joshi’s external stabilization system versus locked compression plating in the management of tibial plateau fractures: A nonrandomized prospective study. J Bone Joint Dis 2021;36:14-20. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.
    Patel P, Singh H, Agarwal KK, Patel T, Saoji K, Patel D. Functional outcome of comminuted upper metaphyseal tibial fracture treated with circular external fixators. Int J Res Orthop 2021;7:622. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.
    Ranjan A, Shah NK, Shrivastava A, Sah AK, Shah TP, Shah RK. Management of tibial metaphyseal fractures using JESS fixator. Int J Orthop Res 2021;4:102-7. [Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article: Sinha S, Kumar A, Kumar S, Qureshi OA, Jameel J, Shyam A. The Joshi External Stabilization System: Simple yet Versatile. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2024 October, 14(10): 1-3.
RELATED POSTS