ISSN Number - pISSN 2250 – 0685 | eISSN 2321-3817

Your Advertisement

Outcome of Deformity Correction of Malunited Fracture of the Tibia: An Uncommon Case Report

Case report
[ https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5554]
PDF Downloaded : 16 Fulltext Viewed : 48 views
CROSSMARK LOGO

Outcome of Deformity Correction of Malunited Fracture of the Tibia: An Uncommon Case Report

Learning Point of the Article :
Malunited shaft of tibia fracture is one of the most common complications encountered in developing countries. Patients may present with severe angular deformities, leading to gross morbidity of life. Deformity correction surgery in such patients may significantly improve the quality of life.
Case report | Volume 15 | Issue 05 | JOCR May 2025 | Page 56-60 | Vivek Maurya [1], Mohd Faisal [1], Padmanabh Kukde [1] . DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5554
Authors: Vivek Maurya [1], Mohd Faisal [1], Padmanabh Kukde [1]
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Vivek Maurya, Department of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: vivek.vom@gmail.com
Article Received : 2025-02-17,
Article Accepted : 2025-04-10

Introduction: Fractures of the tibial shaft are prevalent in developing countries such as India, often resulting from road traffic accidents. Inadequate access to medical care, financial constraints, and lack of awareness often lead to suboptimal treatment, increasing the risk of complications such as malunion. Malunion may manifest as shortening, angular, or rotational malalignment. However, managing such deformities presents significant challenges, especially when associated with soft-tissue contractures and severe bony deformities. Advances in orthopedic techniques, including corrective osteotomy, internal fixation, external fixation, and Ilizarov ring fixation, have improved outcomes in treating these deformities.

Case Report: This is a case report of a 57-year-old female who presented to the outpatient department with a deformity of her left leg, having a traumatic history 9 months ago for which she took treatment from a quack. She underwent a single-stage deformity correction using the intramedullary interlocking nail and achieved clinical and radiological union following the same.

Conclusion: Malunited tibia fractures can be treated effectively with corrective osteotomy and internal fixation with intramedullary nails.

Keywords: Deformity correction, intramedullary nail, malunion.

Introduction:

In developing countries such as India, fractures of the shaft of the tibia are common due to the higher incidence of road traffic accidents [1]. With the proper application of orthopedic principles in the management of fractures, the complications are minimal. However, in our clinical setting and environment, not all patients opt for treatment due to inaccessibility to medical care, lack of monetary funds, or lack of knowledge [2]. Following improper treatment, malunion is a frequent complication that can lead to shortening, angular, or rotational malalignment [3-5]. In general, an angulation of 5–8° malrotation of 15–20° and shortening of 2 cm can be well tolerated by a patient [5]. In addition to the patient, management of such deformities can be a challenge to a surgeon due to associated soft-tissue contractures along with the bony deformity [6]. However, advances in orthopedic principles of operative management have provided necessary treatment solutions for the management of post-traumatic deformities. Corrective osteotomy and internal fixation, external fixation with rods and pins, and Ilizarov ring fixation are some of the treatment options. In severe deformities associated with comorbidities, amputation can act as a last resort [5,7,8].

Case Report:

A 57-year-old female presented to our outpatient department (OPD) with a deformity of her left leg and difficulty in walking. She gave a history of falls, following which she complained of pain and difficulty to weight bear on her left leg and went to a local quack for further treatment. After being splinted for a month, she complained of deformity over her left leg, which subsequently progressed over the course of the next month. She has been unable to bear weight on the affected leg since then and came to our OPD for medical treatment. On local examination, she had an angular deformity in the anteroposterior plane in the middle third of the left leg with no mobility in the mediolateral or anteroposterior plane. There was no tenderness or local rise in temperature. A scar was seen of approximately 1.5 × 1.5 cm over the anteromedial aspect of the left leg. The knee and ankle range of motion was restricted, and there was no neurovascular deficit. Approximately 7 cm shortening of the ipsilateral leg was seen due to angular deformity (Fig. 1).

Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the leg showed malunited fractures of the shaft of the tibia and fibula with anterior angulation (Fig. 2).

A complete pre-operative blood investigation was done, and the patient was screened for any signs of active infection. After a thorough explanation regarding the operative treatment and consent from the patient, she was posted for a single-stage deformity corrective surgery with internal fixation. Pre-operative planning included correcting the longitudinal axis of the tibia in both the anteroposterior and lateral planes. The osteotomy level and angle were calculated before surgery (Fig. 3).

A 10 cm skin incision was taken anterolaterally on the apex of the deformity. After soft-tissue dissection, K-wires were inserted at the level of osteotomy, and osteotomy was done with a drill saw (Fig. 4a and b). After deformity correction post-osteotomy, a guidewire was inserted from the tibial plateau, and an intramedullary interlocking nail was inserted through it for internal fixation (Fig. 5-7).

Postoperatively, the patient had an acceptable shortening of 1 cm, was discharged after 3 days, and was advised of protected weight bearing for the initial 3 weeks, followed by full weight bearing thereafter. She was kept under close follow-up to assess clinical and radiological outcomes. No intraoperative or post-operative complications were noted. After 6 months postoperatively, she achieved clinical and radiological union with no complaints at present (Fig. 8-10).

Discussion:

Angular deformity arising from a malunited shaft of tibia fracture can lead to cosmetic and functional derangement for the patient. However, the deformity can be successfully corrected with good clinical and radiological outcomes, as demonstrated by the index case. The choice of surgery for correction of deformity depends on a lot of factors such as the degree of angulation, soft-tissue condition, and experience of the surgeon, as well as the availability of choice of implant [9,10]. Corrective osteotomy for a malunited long bone fracture is of two types, namely: (1) Angulation only or (2) angulation with translational osteotomy. Angulation-only osteotomy is divided into open-wedge and closed-wedge osteotomy. Open wedge osteotomy prevents shortening; however, it runs the risk of fracture gap, thereby further leading to non-union and reoperation if the gap is not filled with bone grafts. Closed-wedge osteotomy may lead to shortening but has lesser non-union and reoperation rates as compared to open-wedge osteotomy [11]. The choice of osteotomy, thus largely depends on the choice of a surgeon as well as available resources. In the index case, a closed wedged angulation-only osteotomy was preferred with an acceptable shortening of 1 cm as there was no rotational deformity. After corrective osteotomy, internal fixation can be achieved by intramedullary nailing or using locking plates. In a cohort study done by Barcak and Collinge [12], 86 patients treated with either intramedullary nails or locking plates were compared for clinical and radiological outcomes. Marginally enhanced functional outcomes were seen in the group treated with intramedullary nailing as compared to locking plates. Complication rates such as non-union, malalignment, and infection were similar between the two. The intramedullary nail was chosen as the method of fixation in the index case due to the monetary limitations of the patient as well as ease of availability. Acceptable criteria for diaphyseal fractures of the tibia include varus/valgus angulation of <5°, anterior-posterior angulation of <10°, rotational angulation of <10°, and shortening ≤1 cm [3]. The patient had an acceptable shortening of 1 cm. The closed-wedge osteotomy with intramedullary nail fixation allowed us to successfully achieve clinical and radiological outcomes by correcting malunion while maintaining the biological stimulus, thereby creating the ideal environment for fracture repair without the need for bone grafts. The only complication we had was of 1 cm shortening which was within the acceptable criteria.

Conclusion:

Intramedullary nailing following deformity correction surgery is a useful tool to maintain the length, alignment, and rotation of the limb. It provides for early weight bearing and mobilization of the patient. With a good knowledge of the anatomical axis and the center of the axis of rotation, malunion can be corrected and maintained with a fixation device of the surgeon’s choice. This case report highlights the benefits of using intramedullary nails as a fixation device for post-deformity correction.

Clinical Message:

The malunited shaft of the tibia with angular deformity can be corrected using an intramedullary nail. Knowledge of the center of rotation of angulation and pre-operative planning can help achieve a good functional outcome even in severe angular deformities.

References

  • 1.
    Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen SH, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S. Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury 2015;46:746-50. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.
    Kumar R. Lack of social or political demand for good health care in India: Impact on unfolding universal health coverage. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4:1-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.
    Thompson JH, Koutsogiannis P, Jahangir A. Tibia fractures overview. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.
    Leach RE. Fractures of the tibia and fibula. In: Rockwood CA Jr., Green DP, editors. Fractures in Adults. 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1984. p 1593-663. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.
    Mechrefe AP, Koh EY, Trafton PG, DiGiovanni CW. Tibial malunion. Foot Ankle Clin N Am 2006;11:19-33. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.
    Pires RE, Gausden EB, Sanchez GT, Wajnsztejn A, Teixeira TM, Da Silva Soares M, et al. Clamshell osteotomy for acute fractures in the malunion setting: A technical note. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:e415-20. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.
    Paley D, Chaudray M, Pirone AM, Lentz P, Kautz D. Treatment of malunions and mal-nonunions of the femur and tibia by detailed preoperative planning and the Ilizarov techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 1990;21:667-91. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.
    Sanders R, Anglen JO, Mark JB. Oblique osteotomy for the correction of tibial malunion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:240-6. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.
    Phieffer LS, Goulet JA. Delayed unions of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:206-16. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.
    Ikpeme IA, Mkpanam NE, Abang IE, Ngim NE, Udosen AM. Long bone non-unions and malunions: Risk factors and treatment outcomes in Calabar, Southern Nigeria. Open J Orthop 2013;3:253-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.
    Neiman R. Focal dome osteotomy for the treatment of diaphyseal malunion of the lower extremity. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58:308. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.
    Barcak E, Collinge CA. Metaphyseal distal tibia fractures: A cohort, single-surgeon study comparing outcomes of patients treated with minimally invasive plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:e169-74 [Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article: Maurya V, Faisal M, Kukde P. Outcome of Deformity Correction of Malunited Fracture of the Tibia: An Uncommon Case Report. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2025 May, 15(05): 56-60.
RELATED POSTS